{"id":822,"date":"2009-02-24T09:39:51","date_gmt":"2009-02-24T07:39:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/?p=822"},"modified":"2024-03-08T10:45:46","modified_gmt":"2024-03-08T07:45:46","slug":"dis-politikamizin-istikameti-turkiye-gazetesi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/?p=822","title":{"rendered":"DI\u015e POL\u0130T\u0130KAMIZIN \u0130ST\u0130KAMET\u0130 (24.02.2009) T\u00fcrkiye Gazetesi"},"content":{"rendered":"

T\u00fcrk d\u0131\u015f politikas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda d\u00f6nemsel olarak g\u00fcndeme getirilen bir iddia T\u00fcrkiye’nin Bat\u0131’dan uzakla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Do\u011fu’ya y\u00f6neldi\u011fidir. Ne zaman Rusya’ya, Orta Do\u011fu ya da Afrika \u00fclkelerinden birine \u00fcst d\u00fczey bir ziyaret yap\u0131lsa, yahut bu \u00fclkelerden bir konuk a\u011f\u0131rlansa derhal o malum tantana ba\u015flar: “T\u00fcrkiye AB’den vazge\u00e7ti”, “Kendisine yeni alternatifler ar\u0131yor”, “Yak\u0131nda \u0130ran’a d\u00f6nece\u011fiz”. Bu s\u00f6zleri s\u00f6yleyenler \u00fc\u00e7 k\u0131s\u0131md\u0131r. Birincisi, siyasi muhalefettir. Hangi h\u00fck\u00fcmet d\u00f6neminde olursa olsun, d\u0131\u015f politika gibi teknik ve kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc bir yap\u0131s\u0131 olan bir alanda derinlemesine kafa yorup fikir \u00fcretmek yerine siyasi parti liderlerinin \u00e7o\u011funun yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fey sloganlara s\u0131\u011f\u0131nmakt\u0131r. Bu sloganlardan duymaya en fazla al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z ise T\u00fcrkiye’nin Bat\u0131’dan sapt\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r. \u0130DEOLOJ\u0130N\u0130N ES\u0130RLER\u0130 <\/strong>\u0130kinci k\u0131s\u0131m, So\u011fuk Sava\u015f d\u00f6neminde e\u011fitim alm\u0131\u015f, ideolojilerin esiri olmu\u015f, meslek hayat\u0131n\u0131n bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fc bu d\u00f6nemde s\u00fcrd\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f, So\u011fuk Sava\u015f’\u0131n sona ermesinin \u00fczerinden neredeyse 20 y\u0131l ge\u00e7mi\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen d\u00fcnyay\u0131 h\u00e2l\u00e2 Do\u011fu-Bat\u0131 ekseninde analiz etme al\u0131\u015fkanl\u0131klar\u0131ndan kurtulamam\u0131\u015f akademisyenler ve emekli b\u00fcrokratlard\u0131r. \u0130deolojiler bu ki\u015filerin zihin d\u00fcnyas\u0131na \u00f6ylesine hakim olmu\u015ftur ki, art\u0131k kendileri i\u00e7in saplant\u0131 haline gelen basmakal\u0131p dar \u00e7er\u00e7evelerin d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bir d\u00fcnyan\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tahayy\u00fcl etmeyi dahi istemezler. Yenilik ve de\u011fi\u015fimin ad\u0131 bile onlar\u0131 \u00fcrk\u00fct\u00fcr. Ezberledikleri ve tek do\u011fru kabul ettikleri modas\u0131 ge\u00e7mi\u015f analiz y\u00f6ntemlerini, her d\u00f6nemi izaha muktedir sihirli re\u00e7etelermi\u015f gibi kullanmaya devam ederler. Bunlar\u0131n bariz bir yan\u0131lg\u0131s\u0131, d\u00fcnyadaki her \u00fclke veya b\u00f6lgeyi etiketleme al\u0131\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r: “Orta Do\u011fu batakl\u0131kt\u0131r”, “Afrika geri kalm\u0131\u015f kabileler k\u0131tas\u0131d\u0131r”, “Rusya tehdittir”, “Orta Asya Rusya’n\u0131n uydusudur”, “ABD dosttur”, “\u0130srail vazge\u00e7ilmezdir” vs. G\u00d6REVL\u0130 ‘UZMANLAR’ <\/strong>\u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc k\u0131s\u0131m, T\u00fcrkiye’nin d\u0131\u015f politikada ba\u011f\u0131ml\u0131l\u0131ktan kurtulup, kendi ulusal \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda ad\u0131mlar atmas\u0131ndan \u00e7ok da ho\u015fnut olmayan, T\u00fcrkiye’nin b\u00f6lgesel bir g\u00fc\u00e7 olma \u00e7abalar\u0131n\u0131 kendileri i\u00e7in b\u00fcy\u00fck bir tehdit olarak alg\u0131layan di\u011fer devletlerdir. Genellikle ABD ve Avrupa \u00fclkelerindeki d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce kurulu\u015flar\u0131nda (think tank) y\u00fcksek maa\u015flarla istihdam edilen T\u00fcrkiye k\u00f6kenli “uzmanlar” \u00fczerinden T\u00fcrkiye’nin b\u00f6lgesinde etkin olmak i\u00e7in yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131mlar\u0131 b\u00fcy\u00fck hatalar olarak lanse ederler. Bu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce kurulu\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n T\u00fcrkiye k\u00f6kenli “uzmanlar\u0131n\u0131” ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131 \u00fclkelerde kimse tan\u0131maz, kimse dikkate almaz. Zaten maksat ABD veya Avrupa kamuoylar\u0131n\u0131 T\u00fcrkiye hakk\u0131nda bilgilendirmek de\u011fildir. Bu “uzmanlar” T\u00fcrkiye’deki kamuoyunu etkilemek ve onun \u00fczerinden T\u00fcrk d\u0131\u015f politikas\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fumunu y\u00f6nlendirmek i\u00e7in \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131rlar. \u0130\u015fin ilginci, ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131 \u00fclkede kimsenin ciddiye almad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bu ki\u015filer, T\u00fcrkiye’de baz\u0131 \u00e7evrelerce el \u00fcst\u00fcnde tutulur. Hi\u00e7bir akademik derinli\u011fi olmayan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fleri, yukar\u0131da bahsetti\u011fim ilk iki k\u0131s\u0131m taraf\u0131ndan dillere dolan\u0131r. Bu \u00fc\u00e7 k\u0131sma mensup zevat\u0131n ba\u015flar\u0131n\u0131 kumdan \u00e7\u0131karmad\u0131klar\u0131 i\u00e7in anlamad\u0131klar\u0131 ya da maksatlar\u0131n\u0131n gere\u011fi olarak anlamak istemedikleri \u015fey T\u00fcrkiye gibi bir \u00fclkenin, hele d\u00fcnyan\u0131n iktisadi ve siyasi yap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015ftan a\u015fa\u011f\u0131ya yeniden \u015fekillenmekte oldu\u011fu bir d\u00f6nemde tek y\u00f6nl\u00fc bir d\u0131\u015f politika izlemesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r. K\u00d6PR\u00dc DE\u011e\u0130L ANA TERM\u0130NAL <\/strong>T\u00fcrkiye tek ba\u015f\u0131na ne bir Bat\u0131, ne de bir Do\u011fu \u00fclkesidir. Tek ba\u015f\u0131na ne Avrupal\u0131, ne de Asyal\u0131d\u0131r. D\u00fcnyada \u00e7ok az \u00fclkeye nasip olan bir \u00f6zellik T\u00fcrk d\u0131\u015f politikas\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fturulup, y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesinde nam\u00fctenahi bir \u00e7e\u015fitlilik imkan\u0131 sunmaktad\u0131r: T\u00fcrkiye hem Avrupa, hem Asya, hem Karadeniz, hem Akdeniz, hem Balkan, hem Orta Do\u011fu \u00fclkesidir. T\u00fcrkiye, Do\u011fu ile Bat\u0131 aras\u0131nda, kimliksiz, ki\u015filiksiz, sadece \u00fczerinden ge\u00e7enlere hizmet sunan bir k\u00f6pr\u00fc de\u011fildir. Bu k\u00f6pr\u00fc metaforu bizatihi T\u00fcrk d\u0131\u015f politikas\u0131n\u0131 alternatifsizlik bata\u011f\u0131na sokmak i\u00e7in geli\u015ftirilmi\u015f ve maalesef geni\u015f siyasi ve b\u00fcrokratik kesimlerce benimsenmi\u015ftir. T\u00fcrkiye, \u00e7evresindeki t\u00fcm b\u00f6lgeleri birbirine ba\u011flayan ana terminaldir. Bu terminalden her yere gidilir, bu terminale her yerden gelinir. Gerek co\u011frafi konumu gerek imparatorluk bakiyesi sebebiyle, b\u00fcnyesinde, etraf\u0131ndaki b\u00f6lgelerden \u00f6zellikler ta\u015f\u0131yan T\u00fcrkiye, bu niteli\u011fiyle yukar\u0131da sayd\u0131\u011f\u0131m t\u00fcm b\u00f6lgelerin uluslararas\u0131 ili\u015fkilerinin m\u00fc\u015fterek vazge\u00e7ilmez \u00f6gesidir. AB B\u0130R ARA\u00c7TIR <\/strong>T\u00fcrkiye’nin Tanzimat’tan -hatta Lale Devri’nden- beri y\u00fcz\u00fcn\u00fc Bat\u0131’ya \u00e7evirdi\u011fi do\u011frudur. Ama yanl\u0131\u015f olan Bat\u0131’y\u0131 nihai ama\u00e7 olarak g\u00f6rmektir. Halbuki, T\u00fcrk d\u0131\u015f politikas\u0131n\u0131n nihai amac\u0131 T\u00fcrkiye’nin muas\u0131r medeniyet seviyesinin \u00fczerine \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayacak yollar\u0131 a\u00e7makt\u0131r. Bu hedefe ula\u015fmak i\u00e7in T\u00fcrkiye’yi y\u00f6netenlerin her t\u00fcrl\u00fc arac\u0131 kullanmas\u0131ndan daha tabii ne olabilir? Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede AB \u00fcyeli\u011fi de bir ara\u00e7t\u0131r, Ekonomik \u0130\u015fbirli\u011fi \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda geli\u015ftirilen ili\u015fkiler de. Karadeniz Ekonomik \u0130\u015fbirli\u011fi de bir ara\u00e7t\u0131r, Afrika ve Orta Do\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131mlar\u0131 da. Bunlar\u0131n hi\u00e7biri, birbirine alternatif de\u011fildir. T\u00fcrkiye, AB yolu t\u0131kand\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in Orta Asya’ya, ya da ABD ile ili\u015fkileri gerginle\u015fti\u011fi i\u00e7in Rusya’ya d\u00f6nmez. Hepsiyle ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131, zenginle\u015ftirilmi\u015f, \u00e7ok y\u00f6nl\u00fc ili\u015fkiler kurmas\u0131 t\u00fcm bu alanlarda T\u00fcrkiye’nin daha etkin olmas\u0131 sonucunu verir. Bu, bir yerdeki ba\u015far\u0131n\u0131n, di\u011fer yerleri de etkiledi\u011fi b\u00fct\u00fcnc\u00fcl bir s\u00fcre\u00e7tir. T\u00fcrkiye’nin Orta Do\u011fu’daki prestiji AB \u00fcyelik s\u00fcreci sayesinde artm\u0131\u015f ama di\u011fer taraftan Orta Do\u011fu’da etkinlik kazanmas\u0131 da AB \u00fclkeleri nezdindeki dikkate al\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 y\u00fckseltmi\u015ftir. T\u00fcrk d\u0131\u015f politikas\u0131n\u0131n istikameti ne Do\u011fu’dur, ne de Bat\u0131. \u0130stikamet muas\u0131r medeniyet seviyesinin \u00fczerine \u00e7\u0131kmak, T\u00fcrk insan\u0131na daha huzurlu, daha m\u00fcreffeh bir gelecek in\u015fa etmektir. \u00dclkeyi bu istikamette salimen ilerletecek her t\u00fcrl\u00fc arac\u0131 en etkili bi\u00e7imde kullanmak da t\u00fcm h\u00fck\u00fcmetlerin sadece g\u00f6revi de\u011fil ama ayn\u0131 zamanda mecburiyetidir.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T\u00fcrk d\u0131\u015f politikas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda d\u00f6nemsel olarak g\u00fcndeme getirilen bir iddia T\u00fcrkiye’nin Bat\u0131’dan uzakla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Do\u011fu’ya y\u00f6neldi\u011fidir. Ne zaman Rusya’ya, Orta Do\u011fu ya da Afrika \u00fclkelerinden birine \u00fcst d\u00fczey bir ziyaret yap\u0131lsa, yahut bu \u00fclkelerden bir konuk a\u011f\u0131rlansa derhal o malum tantana ba\u015flar: “T\u00fcrkiye AB’den vazge\u00e7ti”, “Kendisine yeni alternatifler ar\u0131yor”, “Yak\u0131nda \u0130ran’a d\u00f6nece\u011fiz”. Bu s\u00f6zleri s\u00f6yleyenler […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":13929,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-822","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gazete"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/822","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=822"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/822\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/13929"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=822"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=822"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=822"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}