{"id":1245,"date":"2011-10-25T08:41:56","date_gmt":"2011-10-25T05:41:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/?p=1245"},"modified":"2024-03-07T22:38:41","modified_gmt":"2024-03-07T19:38:41","slug":"terorle-mucadelede-on-alici-savunma-turkiye-gazetesi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/?p=1245","title":{"rendered":"Ter\u00f6rle m\u00fccadelede \u00f6n al\u0131c\u0131 savunma (25.10.2011) T\u00fcrkiye Gazetesi"},"content":{"rendered":"

NATO \u0130TT\u0130FAKI \u00d6NEML\u0130 S\u0131n\u0131r \u00f6tesinde “\u00f6n al\u0131c\u0131 savunma” operasyonlar\u0131na giri\u015filmeden \u00f6nce, ba\u015fta T\u00fcrkiye’nin m\u00fcttefikleri olmak \u00fczere uluslararas\u0131 alanda yo\u011fun bir ikna faaliyetinin y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi gerekir. Bu noktada NATO ittifak\u0131 \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r. TEK TARAFLI OPERASYON NATO talebinin ret edilmesi, T\u00fcrkiye’nin tek tarafl\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirece\u011fi operasyonlar\u0131n me\u015fruiyetini g\u00fc\u00e7lendirir. T\u00fcrkiye m\u00fcttefiklerinden destek al\u0131rsa, onlarla birlikte, alamazsa tek ba\u015f\u0131na kendi s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcvenli\u011fini sa\u011flamal\u0131. T\u00fcrkiye y\u0131llard\u0131r ter\u00f6rle m\u00fccadele ediyor. Ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc, T\u00fcrkiye’ye kar\u015f\u0131 silahl\u0131 eylemlerini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirirken \u00fclkemize kom\u015fu topraklar\u0131 \u00fcs olarak kullan\u0131yor. \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fcn kararg\u00e2h\u0131 ve e\u011fitim \u00fcsleri uzun bir s\u00fcre boyunca kom\u015fumuz Suriye’de ve Suriye’nin denetimindeki L\u00fcbnan’\u0131n Bekaa Vadisi’ndeydi. 1991’de Irak’\u0131n kuzeyinde, d\u00f6nemin Irak y\u00f6netiminin denetiminin d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda b\u0131rak\u0131lan bir “u\u00e7u\u015fa yasak b\u00f6lge” olu\u015fturulmas\u0131yla birlikte, \u00f6rg\u00fct “\u00c7eki\u00e7 G\u00fc\u00e7 Alan\u0131” olarak da isimlendirilebilecek bu b\u00f6lgeye konu\u015flanmaya ba\u015flad\u0131. Bilhassa Kandil Da\u011f\u0131 ve \u00e7evresindeki sarp alana yay\u0131lm\u0131\u015f \u00e7ok say\u0131da k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fckl\u00fc b\u00fcy\u00fckl\u00fc kamp, T\u00fcrkiye’yi hedef alan ter\u00f6r faaliyetlerinin ba\u015fl\u0131ca kayna\u011f\u0131 haline geldi. ABD’nin 2003’te Saddam H\u00fcseyin’i devirmesinden sonra, \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn Kandil’deki mevcudiyeti giderek per\u00e7inlendi. B\u00f6yle bir ortamda, sadece T\u00fcrkiye topraklar\u0131nda g\u00fcvenlik operasyonlar\u0131 d\u00fczenleyerek, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc \u00e7\u00f6kertmek imk\u00e2ns\u0131z hale geldi. 1990’lardan itibaren y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen \u00e7ok say\u0131da s\u0131n\u0131r \u00f6tesi harek\u00e2tta \u00f6rg\u00fcte darbeler indirilmesine ra\u011fmen, ter\u00f6r yuvas\u0131 haline gelen Kandil Da\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n etkin denetimi sa\u011flanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, bu b\u00f6lge kaynakl\u0131 melanet can\u0131m\u0131z\u0131, y\u00fcre\u011fimizi yakmaya devam etti. DI\u015e M\u0130HRAKLARI K\u00dc\u00c7\u00dcMSEMEY\u0130N T\u00fcrkiye’nin ter\u00f6rle m\u00fccadele tarihi g\u00f6zden ge\u00e7irildi\u011finde, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne verilen “d\u0131\u015f deste\u011fin”, ba\u015fka bir deyi\u015fle, “D\u0131\u015f mihraklar\u0131n T\u00fcrkiye’deki karde\u015fli\u011fi bozma giri\u015fimlerinin” s\u0131kl\u0131kla dile getirilen ifadeler oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Baz\u0131 kesimler bu “d\u0131\u015f mihrak” kavram\u0131n\u0131 k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fcmsemeye ve alaya almaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fsalar bile, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn T\u00fcrkiye’nin d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndan, en az\u0131ndan lojistik anlamda destek almadan ayakta duramayaca\u011f\u0131 ink\u00e2r edilemez bir ger\u00e7ektir. B\u00f6yle olunca da, ter\u00f6rle m\u00fccadelede T\u00fcrkiye’nin d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda da etkin ve kararl\u0131 \u00f6nlemler al\u0131nmad\u0131k\u00e7a, ba\u015far\u0131ya ula\u015fma \u015fans\u0131 azalmaktad\u0131r. ME\u015eRU M\u00dcDAFAA \u0130LKES\u0130 S\u00f6z konusu etkin ve kararl\u0131 \u00f6nlemlerin ba\u015f\u0131nda ise T\u00fcrkiye-Irak s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n, Irak topraklar\u0131ndan ba\u015flayacak \u015fekilde g\u00fcvenli\u011finin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 gelir. Bu iki yolla yap\u0131labilir. Birincisi, s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n Irak taraf\u0131nda bir tampon b\u00f6lge olu\u015fturularak, ter\u00f6ristlerin \u00fclkeye s\u0131zmalar\u0131n\u0131 engellemektir. \u0130kincisi ise ter\u00f6rist yuvas\u0131 haline gelmi\u015f olan Kandil Da\u011f\u0131 ve \u00e7evresini denetim alt\u0131na almakt\u0131r. Her iki \u00f6nlem de, y\u0131llard\u0131r \u00e7e\u015fitli vesilelerle dile getirilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, baz\u0131 sebeplerle bu \u00f6nlemleri ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmeye y\u00f6nelik ad\u0131mlar at\u0131lamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. T\u00fcrkiye’nin bu iki noktada harekete ge\u00e7memesi, asker\u00ee yetersizli\u011finden de\u011fil, Irak’\u0131 halen i\u015fgal alt\u0131nda tutan ABD ve Irak B\u00f6lgesel K\u00fcrt Y\u00f6netimi’yle olan ili\u015fkilerin “zedelenebilece\u011fi” endi\u015fesidir. Uluslararas\u0131 hukukun, bu iki ad\u0131m\u0131n at\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 imk\u00e2ns\u0131z k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyenler de vard\u0131r. H\u00e2lbuki T\u00fcrkiye-Irak s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131nda bir tampon b\u00f6lge, her a\u00e7\u0131dan T\u00fcrkiye’ye muhta\u00e7 durumda olan Irak B\u00f6lgesel Y\u00f6netimi’nin ikna edilmesiyle kolayca kurulabilir. Dahas\u0131 bug\u00fcn bile fiilen “kimsenin denetiminde olmayan” Kandil Da\u011f\u0131 b\u00f6lgesinin T\u00fcrkiye taraf\u0131ndan denetlenmesini, kimin, hangi gerek\u00e7eyle uluslararas\u0131 hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulabilece\u011fi belli de\u011fildir. Kald\u0131 ki, Birle\u015fmi\u015f Milletler Antla\u015fmas\u0131, topraklar\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndan sald\u0131r\u0131lara maruz kalan T\u00fcrkiye’ye kendini savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131 veren “me\u015fru m\u00fcdafaa” ilkesini i\u00e7ermektedir. G\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fczdeki yorumuyla “me\u015fru m\u00fcdafaa” sadece sald\u0131r\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftikten sonra al\u0131nacak tedbirlere de\u011fil, \u00e7ok muhtemel ve yak\u0131n bir sald\u0131r\u0131 tehdidinin bertaraf edilebilmesi i\u00e7in y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclecek eylemlere de cevaz vermektedir. ABD’nin 2003 Irak sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131na dayanak te\u015fkil eden ve pek \u00e7ok a\u00e7\u0131dan uluslararas\u0131 hukukla \u00e7eli\u015fen “\u00f6n al\u0131c\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131” konseptinden fakl\u0131 olarak, ba\u015fka \u00fclkelerin topraklar\u0131ndan kaynaklanan ve o \u00fclke y\u00f6netimlerinin yetersizlikleri ya da isteksizlikleri sebebiyle bir t\u00fcrl\u00fc \u00f6nlenemeyen, a\u00e7\u0131k ve yayg\u0131n ter\u00f6r sald\u0131r\u0131lar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131, T\u00fcrkiye topraklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6tesinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilecek her t\u00fcrl\u00fc asker\u00ee hamle “\u00f6n al\u0131c\u0131 savunma” kavram\u0131yla hukukile\u015ftirilebilir. NATO VE 5. MADDE Elbette, s\u0131n\u0131r \u00f6tesinde “\u00f6n al\u0131c\u0131 savunma” operasyonlar\u0131na giri\u015filmeden \u00f6nce, ba\u015fta T\u00fcrkiye’nin m\u00fcttefikleri olmak \u00fczere uluslararas\u0131 alanda yo\u011fun bir ikna faaliyetinin y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi gerekir. Bu noktada NATO ittifak\u0131 \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r. NATO Antla\u015fmas\u0131’n\u0131n, bir m\u00fcttefik \u00fclkeye yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n, m\u00fcttefiklerin tamam\u0131na yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 ve bu sald\u0131r\u0131ya kar\u015f\u0131 m\u00fc\u015fterek m\u00fcdafaa yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6ren 5. Maddesi tarihte sadece bir defa, hem de bir ter\u00f6r sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda i\u015fletilmi\u015ftir. 11 Eyl\u00fcl ter\u00f6r sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131ndan sonra ABD’nin talebiyle 5. Maddeyi i\u015fleten NATO, bu \u00fclkeye destek olmu\u015ftur. Bug\u00fcn h\u00e2l\u00e2 “uluslararas\u0131 ter\u00f6rle m\u00fccadele” \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclen Afganistan harek\u00e2t\u0131na NATO kumanda etmektedir. RE’SEN HAREKETE GE\u00c7ER M\u0130? Ter\u00f6rle m\u00fccadelede T\u00fcrkiye’nin NATO’dan destek istemesine kar\u015f\u0131 olanlar genellikle, ter\u00f6r\u00fcn bir i\u00e7 mesele oldu\u011fu, ter\u00f6re maruz kalan \u0130spanya ve \u0130ngiltere gibi \u00fclkelerin de NATO’da bir destek talebinde bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131 arg\u00fcman\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerler. Oysa bu iki \u00fclkedeki durumdan farkl\u0131 olarak, T\u00fcrkiye’yi hedef alan \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn binlerce silahl\u0131 militan\u0131, NATO \u00fcyesi olmayan bir ba\u015fka \u00fclkenin topraklar\u0131nda yerle\u015fmi\u015f durumdad\u0131r. Bir g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde, \u00fcstelik silah kullan\u0131lmadan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen 11 Eyl\u00fcl sald\u0131r\u0131lar\u0131yla mukayese edildi\u011finde, Irak topraklar\u0131ndan ba\u015flayarak T\u00fcrkiye’yi hedef alan ter\u00f6r faaliyetlerinin 5. Madde kapsam\u0131na sokulmas\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00e7ok say\u0131da sebep mevcuttur. T\u00fcrkiye y\u0131llard\u0131r maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 bu sald\u0131r\u0131lara ra\u011fmen, bir defa bile NATO’nun yard\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 talep etmemi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, “Ter\u00f6rle m\u00fccadelemizde NATO bize neden yard\u0131mc\u0131 olmuyor?” sorusu anlams\u0131zd\u0131r. T\u00fcrkiye’nin talebi olmadan, NATO’nun re’sen harekete ge\u00e7mesi s\u00f6z konusu olamaz. As\u0131l sorulmas\u0131 gereken \u015fey, \u015fu veya bu sebeple y\u0131llard\u0131r T\u00fcrkiye-Irak s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131nda tampon b\u00f6lge olu\u015fturmayan ve Kandil’e sonu\u00e7 al\u0131c\u0131 bir harek\u00e2t ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmeyen T\u00fcrkiye’nin neden NATO’dan etkin destek talep etmedi\u011fidir. D\u00dcNYA L\u0130DER\u0130 OLMAMIZ \u0130\u00c7\u0130N… Bir destek talebi geldi\u011finde NATO \u00fclkelerinin T\u00fcrkiye’nin ter\u00f6rle m\u00fccadelesine, ABD’ye verdiklerine benzer bir deste\u011fi vereceklerinin elbette garantisi yoktur. Baz\u0131lar\u0131na g\u00f6re, “ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc zaten bunlar cesaretlendirmektedir.” Ama en az\u0131ndan, T\u00fcrkiye’nin talebinin ret edilmesi bile, T\u00fcrkiye’nin tek tarafl\u0131 olarak ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirebilece\u011fi “\u00f6n al\u0131c\u0131 savunma” operasyonlar\u0131n\u0131n me\u015fruiyetini g\u00fc\u00e7lendirir. T\u00fcrkiye m\u00fcttefiklerinden destek al\u0131rsa, onlarla birlikte, alamazsa tek ba\u015f\u0131na kendi s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcvenli\u011fini sa\u011flamal\u0131d\u0131r. Kendi s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131 dahi koruyamayan ve ard\u0131 ard\u0131na \u015fehit veren bir g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc arz etmesi, T\u00fcrkiye’nin “d\u00fcnya liderleri aras\u0131na” girme hedefine hizmet etmemektedir. Lider \u00fclke \u00f6nce kendi topraklar\u0131n\u0131 korur; kendi problemlerini, gerekirse “\u00f6n al\u0131c\u0131 savunma” operasyonlar\u0131 yaparak \u00e7\u00f6zer; ondan sonra \u00e7ok gerekliyse, ba\u015fkalar\u0131n\u0131n meselelerine arabuluculuk rol\u00fc \u00fcstlenir. 27 y\u0131ld\u0131r kendisine sald\u0131ran silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc imha edemeyen bir devletin, uluslararas\u0131 alanda “b\u00fcy\u00fck devlet” olarak nitelendirilmesi zordur.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

NATO \u0130TT\u0130FAKI \u00d6NEML\u0130 S\u0131n\u0131r \u00f6tesinde “\u00f6n al\u0131c\u0131 savunma” operasyonlar\u0131na giri\u015filmeden \u00f6nce, ba\u015fta T\u00fcrkiye’nin m\u00fcttefikleri olmak \u00fczere uluslararas\u0131 alanda yo\u011fun bir ikna faaliyetinin y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi gerekir. Bu noktada NATO ittifak\u0131 \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r. TEK TARAFLI OPERASYON NATO talebinin ret edilmesi, T\u00fcrkiye’nin tek tarafl\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirece\u011fi operasyonlar\u0131n me\u015fruiyetini g\u00fc\u00e7lendirir. T\u00fcrkiye m\u00fcttefiklerinden destek al\u0131rsa, onlarla birlikte, alamazsa tek ba\u015f\u0131na kendi s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131n […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":13597,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1245","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gazete"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1245","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1245"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1245\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/13597"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1245"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1245"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1245"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}