{"id":1181,"date":"2011-05-31T16:11:05","date_gmt":"2011-05-31T13:11:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/?p=1181"},"modified":"2024-03-07T22:57:56","modified_gmt":"2024-03-07T19:57:56","slug":"nato-bocaliyor-turkiye-gazetesi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/?p=1181","title":{"rendered":"NATO BOCALIYOR! (31.05.2011) T\u00fcrkiye Gazetesi"},"content":{"rendered":"

ABD’N\u0130N S\u0130LAHLI TA\u015eERONU G\u00d6R\u00dcNT\u00dcS\u00dcN\u00dc S\u0130LEM\u0130YOR! S\u0130V\u0130LLER\u0130 VURDULAR<\/span><\/p>\n

NATO’nun ‘hedef \u015fa\u015f\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131’ operasyonlar\u0131, \u0130ttifak’\u0131n varl\u0131k sebebini sorgulat\u0131yor. Afganistan’\u0131n g\u00fcneyinde \u00f6nceki g\u00fcn d\u00fczenlenen hava sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131nda 9 sivil hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetti. NATO, sivillerin ‘yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131kla vuruldu\u011funu’ belirtip \u00f6z\u00fcr diledi. Ama buna cevap gecikmedi.?Bombal\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131da 4 Afgan polis \u00f6ld\u00fc. Libya’da da NATO g\u00fc\u00e7lerinin hava sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131nda 11 ki\u015fi hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetti. ADAPTE OLAMADI G\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fczde tam anlam\u0131yla bir bocalama s\u00fcrecinden ge\u00e7en NATO, 3 kez “yeni stratejik konsept” belgesi kabul etmi\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, bir t\u00fcrl\u00fc yeni d\u00f6neme adapte olamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. EKONOM\u0130K KRIZ\u0130N ETK\u0130S\u0130 NATO’nun en b\u00fcy\u00fck finans\u00f6r\u00fc ABD ba\u015fta olmak \u00fczere, \u0130ttifak’a \u00fcye t\u00fcm \u00fclkeler son 3 y\u0131ld\u0131r ciddi bir ekonomik bunal\u0131m ya\u015famaktad\u0131r. Bir sorun da bozuk imaj\u0131n d\u00fczeltilememesidir \u0130kinci D\u00fcnya Sava\u015f\u0131’ndan sonra kurulan ve varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 devam ettiren en etkili savunma mekanizmas\u0131 olan Kuzey Atlantik Antla\u015fmas\u0131 \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc (NATO), g\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fczde tam anlam\u0131yla bir bocalama s\u00fcrecinden ge\u00e7mektedir. So\u011fuk Sava\u015f \u015fartlar\u0131na uygun olarak yap\u0131land\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan NATO, Sovyetler Birli\u011fi’nin da\u011f\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan, sonuncusu 2010 y\u0131l\u0131nda olmak \u00fczere 3 kez “yeni stratejik konsept” belgesi kabul etmi\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, bir t\u00fcrl\u00fc yeni d\u00f6neme adapte olamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Afganistan’da NATO liderli\u011finde s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclen harek\u00e2t, b\u00f6lge tarihinin en uzun sava\u015flar\u0131ndan biri olma yolundad\u0131r. Libya’da y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmekte olan operasyon ise, BM’nin \u00e7izdi\u011fi \u00e7er\u00e7eve i\u00e7inde yer alan “sivilleri koruma” misyonunun \u00e7ok \u00f6tesine ge\u00e7mi\u015f, NATO silahl\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7 kullanarak y\u00f6netim de\u011fi\u015ftirmeye soyunmu\u015ftur. NATO’nun neden Afganistan’da ve Libya’da bulundu\u011funun, Br\u00fcksel’deki \u0130ttifak yetkililerine g\u00f6re \u015f\u00fcphesiz bir a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 vard\u0131r. Ama inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 yitirmi\u015f bu s\u00f6zler, NATO’nun d\u00fcnyan\u0131n sorun ya\u015fanan di\u011fer yerlerinde neden bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 izah etmemektedir. Kuzey Atlantik \u0130ttifak\u0131 en hayati be\u015f sorunla kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131yad\u0131r: Birincisi, NATO’nun bir savunma pakt\u0131 olman\u0131n \u00f6tesine ge\u00e7ip, g\u00fcvenlik \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc olmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131yla ilgilidir. \u00dcye \u00fclkelerin tahsis etti\u011fi asker\u00ee birliklerle harek\u00e2t yapan NATO, kurulu\u015f mant\u0131\u011f\u0131 sebebiyle bir polis g\u00fcc\u00fc de\u011fildir. Olmamal\u0131d\u0131r da. 2010 Stratejik Konsepti’ne g\u00f6re siber uzaydan gelecek tehditlerle m\u00fccadeleyi bile kendi g\u00f6rev alan\u0131 i\u00e7ine d\u00e2hil eden \u0130ttifak, “odaklanamama” sorunu ya\u015famaktad\u0131r. ODAKLANAMAMA SIKINTISI \u0130kinci sorun, NATO’nun co\u011frafi alan\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fcz bi\u00e7imde geni\u015flemesinden kaynaklamaktad\u0131r. E\u015f zamanl\u0131 olarak, Afganistan, Somali ve Libya’da harek\u00e2t y\u00fcr\u00fcten \u0130ttifak, kendisi i\u00e7in neyin vazge\u00e7ilmez ve \u00f6ncelikli oldu\u011funa karar veremez bir durumdad\u0131r. \u00dcstelik NATO askerlerinin \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmalara taraf oldu\u011fu b\u00f6lgelerin hi\u00e7biri 1949 tarihli Kuzey Atlantik Antla\u015fmas\u0131’nda tarif edilen co\u011frafi g\u00f6rev alan\u0131 i\u00e7inde de\u011fildir. Br\u00fcksel’de asli co\u011frafi alana d\u00f6nmekten s\u00f6z edenlerin say\u0131s\u0131 artarken, k\u00fcresel bir g\u00fcvenlik g\u00fcc\u00fc olmaktan yana olanlar da az\u0131msanmayacak say\u0131dad\u0131r. G\u00f6revine “odaklanamayan” NATO, g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na da “odaklanamamaktad\u0131r.” \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fcs\u00fc ekonomiktir. NATO’nun en b\u00fcy\u00fck finans\u00f6r\u00fc ABD ba\u015fta olmak \u00fczere, \u0130ttifak’a \u00fcye t\u00fcm \u00fclkeler son 3 y\u0131ld\u0131r ciddi bir ekonomik bunal\u0131m ya\u015famaktad\u0131r. NATO \u00fcyesi olan Yunanistan, \u0130spanya ve Portekiz ekonomik s\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131n tetikledi\u011fi siyasal sars\u0131nt\u0131larla \u00e7alkalanmaktad\u0131r. Macaristan ve \u0130zlanda ancak d\u0131\u015f destekle iflas\u0131n e\u015fi\u011finden d\u00f6nm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. 2000’lerde \u0130ttifak’a \u00fcye olan eski Do\u011fu Avrupa \u00fclkelerinin t\u00fcm\u00fc ekonomik a\u00e7\u0131dan diken \u00fcst\u00fcnde durmaktad\u0131r. Mali yap\u0131lar\u0131 sars\u0131lan t\u00fcm \u00fclkelerde, ilk olarak kamu harcamalar\u0131nda k\u0131s\u0131nt\u0131ya gidilmesi s\u00f6z konusu olmakta, bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede asker\u00ee harcamalar konusunda frene bas\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bir yandan 3 noktada fiili asker\u00ee operasyon y\u00fcr\u00fcten, di\u011fer yandan da yeni Stratejik Konsept do\u011frultusunda “f\u00fcze kalkan\u0131”, “siber savunma” vb. alanlarda milyarlarca dolarl\u0131k yeni harcama yapmaya haz\u0131rlanan NATO’nun finansman\u0131n\u0131n nas\u0131l sa\u011flanaca\u011f\u0131 hen\u00fcz cevaplanmam\u0131\u015f bir sorudur. VAZGE\u00c7\u0130LMEZ DE\u011e\u0130L! D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc sorun \u00fcye \u00fclkelerin halklar\u0131n\u0131n NATO’ya olan bak\u0131\u015f a\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131ndaki farkl\u0131la\u015fmadan kaynaklanmaktad\u0131r. 2010 y\u0131l\u0131 ‘Trans Atlantik E\u011filimler’ ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131na g\u00f6re Romenler, \u0130talyanlar ve \u0130spanyollar, NATO ile Avrupa Birli\u011fi (AB) aras\u0131ndaki ba\u011flar\u0131n daha da s\u0131k\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131ndan yanayken, Hollandal\u0131lar, Britanyal\u0131lar, Portekizliler, Frans\u0131zlar, Almanlar ve Slovakyal\u0131lar AB’nin NATO’dan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z bir pozisyon almas\u0131n\u0131 desteklemektedirler. \u00dclkelerinin savunulmas\u0131 i\u00e7in NATO’nun vazge\u00e7ilmez oldu\u011funu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnen Almanlar\u0131n oran\u0131 2002’de %74’ken, 2010’da %56’ya d\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ayn\u0131 d\u00f6nemde \u0130talyanlar i\u00e7in de oran %68’den %54’de inmi\u015ftir. Hemen t\u00fcm \u00fcye \u00fclkelerde, NATO’nun Afganistan operasyonunun art\u0131k sona ermesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc bir kanaat mevcuttur. \u00dcye \u00fclkelerin kamuoylar\u0131nda NATO’nun eylemlerine kar\u015f\u0131 giderek artan bir sorgulay\u0131c\u0131 tutum ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmaktayken, h\u00fck\u00fcmetlerin bu tutum kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda tepkisiz kalmalar\u0131 tabii ki, d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclemez. Bu ise, Br\u00fcksel’deki karar alma s\u00fcre\u00e7lerinin \u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fczdeki d\u00f6nemde daha s\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015fabilece\u011finin i\u015faret\u00e7isidir. \u0130MAJI D\u00dcZELTEM\u0130YOR Be\u015finci sorun ise, NATO’nun \u00fcye \u00fclkeler d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki yerlerde son derece bozuk olan imaj\u0131n\u0131n bir t\u00fcrl\u00fc d\u00fczeltilememesidir. Afganistan ve Libya’daki bombalamalarda \u00e7ok say\u0131da sivilin hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetmesi, \u0130ttifak’\u0131n, M\u00fcsl\u00fcman d\u00fcnyadaki, ABD’nin silahl\u0131 ta\u015feronu \u015feklindeki g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fc kuvvetlendirmektedir. En geli\u015fmi\u015f teknolojik imk\u00e2nlara sahip olan NATO birliklerinin hedeflerini \u015fa\u015f\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131 ve masum insanlar\u0131 yok ettikleri her sald\u0131r\u0131, NATO \u00fcyesi \u00fclkelerin h\u00fck\u00fcmetlerinin, s\u00f6z konusu b\u00f6lgelerin gelece\u011fine ili\u015fkin inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 da erozyona u\u011fratmaktad\u0131r. NATO’nun \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm bulmas\u0131 gereken bu \u00f6ncelikli sorunlar\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra, Rusya’n\u0131n \u0130ttifak’a mesafeli duru\u015funu s\u00fcrd\u00fcrmesi, AB ile NATO aras\u0131nda g\u00fcvenlik ve savunma konusunda nas\u0131l i\u015f birli\u011fi yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n halen netle\u015fmemesi, asker\u00ee kanada geri d\u00f6nen Fransa’n\u0131n bir\u00e7ok \u00f6nceli\u011finin T\u00fcrkiye ba\u015fta olmak \u00fczere baz\u0131 NATO \u00fclkelerince benimsenmemesi ve \u0130ran’a kar\u015f\u0131 geli\u015ftirilmesine karar verilen “F\u00fcze Kalkan\u0131”n\u0131n nas\u0131l i\u015fleyece\u011fi gibi bir\u00e7ok ba\u015fka sorun da Br\u00fcksel’deki NATO memurlar\u0131n\u0131 me\u015fgul etmektedir.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

ABD’N\u0130N S\u0130LAHLI TA\u015eERONU G\u00d6R\u00dcNT\u00dcS\u00dcN\u00dc S\u0130LEM\u0130YOR! S\u0130V\u0130LLER\u0130 VURDULAR NATO’nun ‘hedef \u015fa\u015f\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131’ operasyonlar\u0131, \u0130ttifak’\u0131n varl\u0131k sebebini sorgulat\u0131yor. Afganistan’\u0131n g\u00fcneyinde \u00f6nceki g\u00fcn d\u00fczenlenen hava sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131nda 9 sivil hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetti. NATO, sivillerin ‘yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131kla vuruldu\u011funu’ belirtip \u00f6z\u00fcr diledi. Ama buna cevap gecikmedi.?Bombal\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131da 4 Afgan polis \u00f6ld\u00fc. Libya’da da NATO g\u00fc\u00e7lerinin hava sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131nda 11 ki\u015fi hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetti. ADAPTE OLAMADI G\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fczde […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":13640,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1181","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gazete"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1181","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1181"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1181\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/13640"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1181"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1181"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cagrierhan.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1181"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}